I haven’t been posting very much lately. I’ve been reading a lot of novels and gazing at this view:
I’ve also been transcribing some tomato newsletters for my father, the NC Tomato Man, and trying to focus on my impending trip to Madagascar. I have been doing a very bad job of it, and I think it’s because I have to decide on just one path for my research there. I will be writing the travel guide, of course, but that is a side project. The real reason for my trip, the academic one, is to zero in on just one thing that I believe will make a good capstone presentation, and hopefully influence what is happening over there. I have narrowed this down to a couple of topics.
Before the crisis started, I wanted to focus on the gap between development practitioners and the people who are being ‘developed’ – that is, where the mission ends and where real life on the ground begins for the communities that are being ‘helped’. I foresee some difficulty in this, now, as a lot of development agencies in Madagascar have pulled out, which certainly says something about their goals for improving the livelihoods of people. I think I would also have a hard time getting the facts from some of these organizations, especially the ones run from the west, as I’m sure they don’t want to share secrets with a troublemaker. I’ve been thinking all along that what ultimately determines the success of an NGO is to not be needed anymore – this will put a lot of comfortable expats out of their jobs. Development as an industry is a concept that intrigues and disturbs me, and I don’t know if I want to get into that kind of battle. It would definitely raise questions of donor responsibility and restrictions, political impetus for giving aid, and some deeper thinking about the effects of good intentions.
When the Daewoo deal went sour, and the crisis started, and as it hasn’t really shown any promising signs of stopping, a conversation about citizen journalism and independent media sources started growing. On this site, I’ve been aggregating the news for the past few months, and a lot of the most interesting stuff has come from people’s blogs, posts on facebook or twitter, or text messages, instead of mainstream sources that throw around the same stale story for days. So that’s another road to take – the differences between mainstream media coverage of the crisis and the actuality for the regular folks, the impact of the crisis on people in rural areas that we’re not hearing about. The discussion about citizen journalism has grown wider and deeper, and there are a lot of questions about the problem of subjectivity, the credibility of news swiped from someone’s cellphone, and the gaps in information that exist when there is no cross-checking or fact-finding. I think the idea behind citizen-driven media is that there can be a multitude of perspectives and opinions, and when looked at as a big picture, people get a more well-rounded view of a situation. How much of mainstream media is colored by subjectivity anyway? Look at FoxNews.
The ‘land grab’ situation has my interest piqued as well. The impact on foreign direct investment in the form of agricultural acquisition on developing countries seems to be a bad one in most cases – I read on Foreign Policy in Focus yesterday that:
the World Bank and the UN are developing Codes of Conduct for Foreign Land Acquisition. The African Union will also publish investment guidelines in July, and Japan is pushing the G8 to get behind them. New websites tracking these land deals include the international land coalition and GRAIN.
I want to look more into that for a later post.
So these are the things I’m thinking about. It’s good to get them out into the world, I hope I can make a decision soon and get some research questions together.
I should add that the real, non-academic reason for my trip is to see my friend, Zo:
